Manipulative Strategies, Emotion and Framing in Iran and Israel over Nuclear Program Crisis A Critical Ideological Analysis

Sharaf Eldin, Ahmad Abdel Tawwab

doi:10.21608/jwadi.2024.387208

Manipulative Strategies, Emotion and Framing in Iran and Israel over Nuclear Program Crisis A Critical Ideological Analysis

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلف

Ahmad Abdel Tawwab Sharaf Eldin

National Defense College, UAE .,Menoufia University, Egypt

10.21608/jwadi.2024.387208

المستخلص

This research delves into the linguistic strategies employed by Iran and Israel amidst the nuclear program crisis, focusing on manipulative tactics utilized by both sides. The study aims to analyze official statements, speeches, and media communications to unveil manipulative techniques and their influence on public opinion and international relations. The research methodology involves a thorough examination of primary sources like official statements, speeches, and media interviews from key Iranian and Israeli political figures. These sources will undergo qualitative linguistic analysis to scrutinize rhetorical devices, manipulative strategies, and contextual factors surrounding the crisis. The study aims to uncover patterns of manipulation and persuasion employed by Iran and Israel through linguistic tools such as euphemisms, emotional appeals, and framing. By identifying these techniques, the research seeks to elucidate the intended effects on diverse target audiences and provide insights into how language shapes public opinion, influences diplomatic negotiations, and advances political agendas. The findings of this study will contribute to a nuanced understanding of the linguistic strategies used by Iran and Israel in the nuclear program crisis. By shedding light on manipulative strategies employed by both countries, this research aims to enhance comprehension of language's role in geopolitical conflicts while offering implications for policymakers, diplomats, and researchers navigating complex political dynamics.

الكلمات الرئيسية